Planar Tc99m – sestamibi scintimammography should be considered cautiously in the axillary evaluation of breast cancer protocols: Results of an international multicenter trial
© Massardo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 29 December 2004
Accepted: 27 July 2005
Published: 27 July 2005
Lymph node status is the most important prognostic indicator in breast cancer in recently diagnosed primary lesion. As a part of an interregional protocol using scintimammography with Tc99m compounds, the value of planar Tc99m sestamibi scanning for axillary lymph node evaluation is presented. Since there is a wide range of reported values, a standardized protocol of planar imaging was performed.
One hundred and forty-nine female patients were included prospectively from different regions. Their mean age was 55.1 ± 11.9 years. Histological report was obtained from 2.987 excised lymph nodes from 150 axillas. An early planar chest image was obtained at 10 min in all patients and a delayed one in 95 patients, all images performed with 740–925 MBq dose of Tc99m sestamibi. Blind lecture of all axillary regions was interpreted by 2 independent observers considering any well defined focal area of increased uptake as an involved axilla. Diagnostic values, 95% confidence intervals [CI] and also likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated.
Node histology demonstrated tumor involvement in 546 out of 2987 lymph nodes. Sestamibi was positive in 30 axillas (25 true-positive) and negative in 120 (only 55 true-negative). The sensitivity corresponded to 27.8% [CI = 18.9–38.2] and specificity to 91.7% [81.6–97.2]. The positive and negative LR were 3.33 and 0.79, respectively. There was no difference between early and delayed images. Sensitivity was higher in patients with palpable lesions.
This work confirmed that non tomographic Tc99m sestamibi scintimammography had a very low detection rate for axillary lymph node involvement and it should not be applied for clinical assessment of breast cancer.
Lymph node status is the most important prognostic indicator in breast cancer in recently diagnosed primary lesion. The evidence of metastatic involvement in the axilla requires the indication of adjuvant therapy posterior to surgical tumor resection. There is not an accurate anatomical test for this purpose and clinical examination has inappropriate diagnostic values. Routine lymph node dissection is the only accepted method for therapeutic decisions but it is invasive and produces significant associated morbidity such as lymphedema and, eventually, infections. On the other hand, an important proportion of breast cancer patients are node-negative. Ultrasonography has also been reported as helpful, especially adding fine needle aspiration biopsy [1, 2].
The role of nuclear techniques is controversial in the area related with breast cancer [3, 4]. Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine deoxyglucose (FDG) is an excellent method for breast cancer evaluation even though is not easily available; it is used for diagnosis and surgical planning, staging and restaging of local regional recurrence or distant metastases and also for monitoring therapy response. Its value for detecting axillary involvement is somehow debated and it has not been used in routine practice in all centers, due to its current resolution for that purpose. However, it appears to be very helpful in internal mammary node evaluation [5–8].
Sentinel node detection with radioguided biopsy has a well defined role in early staging of breast cancer and small tumors. This technique allows the recognition of lymphatic spreading. It requires nodal histology to decide complete posterior lymphadenectomy. The strategy involves diverse methodologies, is technically challenging, and requires a learning curve [9–12].
Scintimammography is widely available and its diagnostic value in axillary detection is not optimal when using planar images with 99mTc-sestamibi or phosphonates. However, reports using single photon emission tomography (SPECT) images with sestamibi and tetrofosmine labeled with Tc99m have better figures and even pinhole SPECT appears promising.
The aim of the present report was to evaluate through an unbiased standardized method the diagnostic value of planar sestamibi images for axillary involvement in breast cancer patients. This was accomplished in the scope of a multicenter interregional trial evaluating Tc99m compounds for scintimammography in breast cancer evaluation [13, 14].
This prospective study included 149 female patients ranging from 29 to 82 years (mean ± SD: 55,1 ± 11.9), from a multicenter trial on scintimammography Tc99m radiopharmaceuticals co-ordinated by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Sixty per cent were postmenopausal. All patients had confirmed breast carcinoma (one patient had bilateral lesions). Only 50 patients (33.3%) presented also with axillary palpable nodes.
Breast tumor histology
Number of cases
Ductal invasive carcinoma
Lobular invasive carcinoma
Carcinoma in situ
The median size breast lesion was 25 mm ranging from 7 – 80 mm (mean ± SD = 28.8 ± 13.9 mm).
Scintimammography was performed before the histopathological confirmation of the cancer. Cases with fine-needle aspiration as the only confirmatory procedure were excluded. Axillary lymph node dissection in 150 axillary beds was performed as a part of the standard staging.
All patients included in this group provided written informed consent according to their local institutions at participating centres (Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Greece, India, Peru, Turkey and Uruguay).
Tc-99m scintimammography protocol
The same protocol was used in all centres. The radiochemical purity of Tc-99m-MIBI was ≥95%. Patients were injected with a bolus of 740 -925 MBq of sestamibi into an antecubital vein in the contra-lateral arm to the breast lesion or in a pedal vein in the patient with bilateral lesions. A plastic cannula was used to avoid interstitial infiltration and the injection was followed by a saline flush.
The acquisition began 10 min post injection with the patient supine. Imaging parameters were: matrix 256 × 256, peak energy of 140 ± 10% KeV, high-resolution low-energy collimator. The breast-collimator distance was kept to a minimum and a static 10 min image was always acquired. Anterior thoracic images included the neck, both axillas and breasts (with arms up). Lateral views were obtained with the patients in prone position using a commercially available breast pad set, (Pinestar Technology, Inc. Greenville, PA, USA), allowing the organ to hang freely, compressing the contra lateral breast. Delayed images were also obtained 90 min post injection in 95 patients using the same protocol. The gamma cameras were standard for clinical practice, including GE Starcam o, Elscint Apex, Siemens Diacam, and Sopha Sophy. Standardized contrasted images in gray scale were recorded.
All scintimammograms were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, blinded to clinical status of the patients as well as to all other tests results. The readers decided if the scan was positive or negative for lymph node involvement in both axillas. One or more focal areas of increased sestamibi uptake was considered positive. Their number was also consigned. The injection site was available for the observers only when a false positive interpretation was suspected due to radiopharmaceutical retention in a lymph or venous vessel.
Lymph node histology was considered as the gold standard. Results were incorporated to Arcus Quickstat and Instat data set for analysis.
Diagnostic values with a 95% confidence interval [CI] and Likelihood Ratios (LR) were calculated. Student t test was applied.
One-hundred and fifty axillary lymph node dissections were performed in the 149 patients. Malignant involvement was reported in 89 out of 149 patients, (90 axillas). A total of 2987 lymph nodes were removed with a range of 4–47 nodes per patient (mean ± SD: 19.9 ± 9.7). Of these 2987 nodes, 546 presented histological tumoral status.
Sestamibi scintimammography was positive in 30 axillas (25 of them true-positive) and negative in 120 (55 true-negative). Thus, the sensitivity corresponded to 27.8% [CI = 18.9–38.2] and specificity to 91.7% [CI = 81.6–97.2]. The positive and negative LR were 3.33 and 0.79, respectively.
Two thirds of the axillas with single node involvement were false-negative (12 cases). When multi-nodal involvement was present, 31 cases with 2–5 nodes were false negative as well as 14 cases with 6–10 nodes, and in cases with more than 11 nodes involved, 8 cases were false-negative. There was a trend to lower sensitivity in the axillas with less than 5 nodes involved: 13.8 % versus 32.4% (p:0.47). With the currently used cut-off of 3 nodes involved, 53% of the false-negatives axillas were equal or under that number.
The only five false-positives corresponded to reactive lymphadenitis, follicular hyperplasia or were just specified as non-malignant.
These results support that planar imaging with scintimammography and Tc99m- sestamibi should be definitively excluded or considered cautiously for axillary evaluation protocols in breast cancer.
Different techniques for axillary evaluation
Scintimammography results according to number of axillary nodes involved
N° involved nodes/axilla
N° axillas False-Negative
N° axillas True-Positive
It is interesting to mention that sestamibi is helpful for the diagnosis of melanoma lymph node assessment , contrary to the observed situation discussed in breast cancer. The reason for this fact could be the most superficial and somehow easier to locate melanomatous involved nodes. The nodes in axillas are deeply positioned which can probably contribute to the lower sestamibi uptake in breast cancer.
PET FDG has been proposed in order to reduce the proportion of patients requiring axillary dissection with variable results, but until now the technique cannot adequately assess the number of nodes involved. However, it could be very helpful in the evaluation of internal mammary chain in upper medial quadrant primary tumours, as well as in patients with large lesions. According to Danforth et al.  in 495 patients its global sensitivity for axillary involvement was 89% [95%CI = 86–92], with a specificity of 87% [95%CI = 84–90]. Yutani et al.  reported that FDG is sufficiently sensitive to rule out lymph node metastasis. Greco et al.  reported in 167 patients FDG sensitivity of 94%, specificity 86% and accuracy of 90% for axillary evaluation.
Diagnostic value of the published literature (PUBMED) in breast cancer axillary lymph node evaluation using Tc99m sestamibi.
N° of patients
Lam et al. Eur J Nucl Med, 1996
Cistaro et al. Minerva Chir, 1997
Schillaci et al. Anticancer Res, 1997
61.9 81 *
96.4 92.9 *
Akcay et al. Clin Nucl Med, 1997
Tolmos et al. Am Surg, 1997
Perre et al. Eur J Surg Oncol, 1997
Taillefer et al. J Nucl Med, 1998
Danielsson et al. Acta Radiol, 1999
Arslan et al. Nucl Med Commun, 1999
Mulero et al. Rev Esp Med Nucl, 2000
Yutani et al. J Comput Assist Tomography, 2000
Nishiyama et al. Eur J Nucl Med, 2001
Lumachi et al. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2001
Chen et al. Chin Med J, 2003
Other compounds labeled with Tc99m
Regarding data with other compounds labeled with Tc99m, commonly used, especially tetrofosmin also a cationic lipophilic molecule, the values are similar to sestamibi in breast cancer evaluation [19, 31]. Akcay  found comparable diagnostic value for both in a small number of patients with involved axillary nodes. The experience with SPECT is significantly better including small primary breast tumours . Tc99m diphosphonates (MDP) proposed as an interesting alternative as well as pentavalent DMSA, have less diagnostic value than sestamibi for breast primary lesions and also for axillary node evaluation, according to our group results and others [13, 26].
The addition of P-SPECT
Madeddu and Spanu, using tetrofosmin, proposed recently SPECT with pinhole (P-SPECT) as the best technique to evaluate the axilla. Their group demonstrated that P-SPECT has better sensitivity compared to SPECT and they, individually, were superior to planar imaging, even for non palpable axillary lesions [33–35]. Their group previously reported also that tetrofosmin SPECT has better sensitivity than planar scintimammography for palpable and non palpable axillary lesions . When P-SPECT was performed with sentinel node detection both techniques combined gave 100% accuracy and P-SPECT was able to identify 81.2% of cases with a single node, and correctly classified 93.7% of the patients with ≤ or > 3 metastatic nodes .
Other interesting points
It has been reported that sestamibi and FDG are related with low radiopharmaceutical uptake in early forms of breast carcinoma that make tumoral detection more difficult in certain cancer subtypes, such as invasive lobular carcinoma and low-grade tumors, even with locally advanced disease [38–40]. It appears that favorable response to neoadjuvant therapy, in locally advanced disease is complex due to tumoral flow and metabolic changes .
Finally, it should be considered that in women with a clinically negative axilla the information obtained from surgical dissection in order to decide adjuvant therapy is related to age and other factors, such as tumor characteristics . SPECT equipment capacity should be ameliorated in order to improve the detection of smaller lesions in breast carcinoma, as was published with phantom models . The recent and excellent review by Taillefer (44) regarding scintimammography suggested that it is necessary to define the clinical niches of the test. In axilla, the diagnostic accuracy of sestamibi varied between 80–85% (with an overall accuracy of 81% (411/509) for 12 reports including two with SPECT); for him, this value is still too low to advocate its use to avoid axillary node dissection in patients with proven invasive primary breast cancer.
There is strong information supporting that planar sestamibi data is not an adequate alternative for axillary evaluation in breast cancer. We believe that countries with limited resources regarding radiopharmaceuticals and equipment availability, should avoid the non-tomographic protocol.
List of abbreviations
Positron Emission Tomography
Single Photon Emission Tomography
SPECT with pinhole
To all physicians and nuclear medicine personnel involved in this IAEA project.
The study was supported by a grant form the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Coordinated Research Project E1.30.17
- Bedrosian I, Bedi D, Kuerer HM, Fornage BD, Harker L, Ross MI, Ames FC, Krishnamurthy S, Edeiken-Monroe BS, Meric F, Feig BW, Akins J, Singletary SE, Mirza NQ, Hunt KK: Impact of clinicopathological factors on sensitivity of axillary ultrasonography in the detection of axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 1025-30. 10.1245/ASO.2003.12.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sapino A, Cassoni P, Zanon E, Fraire F, Croce S, Coluccia C, Donadio M, Bussolati G: Ultrasonographically-guided fine-needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes: role in breast cancer management. Br J Cancer. 2003, 88: 702-706. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600744.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schillaci O, Buscombe JR: Breast scintigraphy today: indications and limitations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004, 31 (Suppl 1): S35-45. 10.1007/s00259-004-1525-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buscombe JR, Holloway B, Roche N, Bombardieri E: Position of nuclear medicine modalities in the diagnostic work-up of breast cancer. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004, 48: 109-18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greco M, Crippa F, Agresti R, Seregni E, Gerali A, Giovanazzi R, Micheli A, Asero S, Ferraris C, Gennaro M, Bombardieri E, Cascinelli N: Axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography: clinical evaluation and alternative management. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001, 93: 630-5. 10.1093/jnci/93.8.630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crippa F, Gerali A, Alessi A, Agresti R, Bombardieri E: FDG-PET for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004, 31 (Suppl 1): S97-102. 10.1007/s00259-004-1531-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eubank WB, Mankoff DA, Takasugi J, Vesselle H, Eary JF, Shanley TJ, Gralow JR, Charlop A, Ellis GK, Lindsley KL, Austin-Seymour MM, Funkhouser CP, Livingston RB: 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect mediastinal or internal mammary metastases in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19: 3516-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bellon JR, Livingston RB, Eubank WB, Gralow JR, Ellis GK, Dunnwald LK, Mankoff DA: Evaluation of the internal mammary lymph nodes by FDG-PET in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Am J Clin Oncol. 2004, 27: 407-10. 10.1097/01.coc.0000128869.19357.9b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fehr MK, Hornung R, Varga Z, Burger D, Hess T, Haller U, Fink D, von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC: Axillary staging using positron emission tomography in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Breast J. 2004, 10: 89-93. 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21455.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leidenius M, Krogerus L, Toivonen T, Leppanen E, von Smitten K: The sensitivity of axillary staging when using sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003, 29: 849-53. 10.1016/j.ejso.2003.09.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goyal A, Douglas-Jones A, Newcombe RG, Mansel RE, ALMANAC Trialists Group: Predictors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2004, 40: 1731-7. 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Der Vegt B, Doting MH, Jager PL, Wesseling J, De Vries J: Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004, 30: 715-20. 10.1016/j.ejso.2004.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massardo T, Alonso O, Kabasakal L, Llamas-Olier A, Shankar UR, Zhu H, Delgado L, Gonzalez P, Mut F, Padhy AK: Diagnostic value of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate and 99mTc-pentavalent DMSA compared with 99mTc-sestamibi for palpable breast lesions. J Nucl Med. 2002, 43: 882-888.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alonso O, Massardo T, Delgado LB, Horvath J, Kabasakal L, Llamas-Olier A, Maunda KK, Morales R, Padhy AK, Shankar UR: Is (99m)Tc-sestamibi scintimammography complementary to conventional mammography for detecting breast cancer in patients with palpable masses?. J Nucl Med. 2001, 42: 1614-21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yutani K, Shiba E, Kusuoka H, Tatsumi M, Uehara T, Taguchi T, Takai SI, Nishimura T: Comparison of FDG-PET with MIBI-SPECT in the detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000, 24: 274-80. 10.1097/00004728-200003000-00017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lam WW, Yang WT, Chan YL, Stewart IE, Metreweli C, King W: Detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma by technetium-99m sestamibi breast scintigraphy, ultrasound and conventional mammography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996, 23: 498-503. 10.1007/BF01249619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cistaro A, Bonazzi G, Bello M, Bessone M, Tetti M, Villata E, Coluccia C, Bisi G, Massaioli N: Breast carcinoma and the axillary lymph node status: the use of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography for the diagnosis and preoperative staging. Preliminary results. Minerva Chir. 1997, 52: 1177-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schillaci O, Scopinaro F, Danieli R, Tavolaro R, Cannas P, Picardi V, Colella AC: Technetium-99m sestamibi imaging in the detection of axillary lymph node involvement in patients with breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 1997, 17: 1607-1610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akcay MN, Akin Y, Karabag B, Ozcan O, Oren D: Tc-99m tetrofosmin in breast carcinoma and axillary lymph node metastases: a comparative study with Tc-99m MIBI. Clin Nucl Med. 1997, 22: 832-4. 10.1097/00003072-199712000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tolmos J, Khalkhali I, Vargas H, Stuntz M, Cutrone J, Mishkin F, Diggles L, Venegas R, Klein S: Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis of breast carcinoma with technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography. Am Surg. 1997, 63: 850-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perre CI, Rutter JE, Vos PA, de Hooge P: Technetium-99m-sestamibi uptake in axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997, 23: 142-4. 10.1016/S0748-7983(97)80008-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taillefer R, Robidoux A, Turpin S, Lambert R, Cantin J, Leveille J: Metastatic axillary lymph node technetium-99m-MIBI imaging in primary breast cancer. J Nucl Med. 1998, 39: 459-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danielsson R, Bone B, Perbeck L, Aspelin P: Evaluation of planar scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI in the detection of axillary lymph node metastases of breast carcinoma. Acta Radiol. 1999, 40: 491-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arslan N, Ozturk E, Ilgan S, Urhan M, Karacalioglu O, Pekcan M, Tufan T, Bayhan H: 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography in the evaluation of breast lesions and axillary involvement: a comparison with mammography and histopathological diagnosis. Nucl Med Commun. 1999, 20: 317-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mulero F, Nicolas F, Castellon MI, Claver MA, Abad L, Nuno de la Rosa JA: Scintigraphy with 99mTc-MIBI in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node invasion of breast cancer. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2000, 19: 416-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishiyama Y, Yamamoto Y, Ono Y, Irie A, Yamauchi A, Satoh K, Ohkawa M: Comparative evaluation of 99mTc-MIBI and 99mTc-HMDP scintimammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer and its axillary metastases. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001, 28: 522-8. 10.1007/s002590000473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lumachi F, Ferretti G, Povolato M, Marzola MC, Zucchetta P, Geatti O, Bui F, Brandes AA: Usefulness of 99m-Tc-sestamibi scintimammography in suspected breast cancer and in axillary lymph node metastases detection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001, 27: 256-9. 10.1053/ejso.2000.1096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Wu H, Zhou J, Hu J: Using Tc-99m MIBI scintimammography to differentiate nodular lesions in breast and detect axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003, 116: 620-4.Google Scholar
- Alonso O, Martinez M, Delgado L, Lago G, Juri C, Borges AL, Lopes de Amorim MC, de Boni D, Espasandin J, Priario J: Comparison of 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of occult lymph node metastases from cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Dermatol. 2003, 13: 449-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danforth DN, Aloj L, Carrasquillo JA, Bacharach SL, Chow C, Zujewski J, Whatley M, Galen B, Merino M, Neumann RD: The role of 18F-FDG-PET in the local/regional evaluation of women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002, 75: 135-46. 10.1023/A:1019664126220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horne T, Pappo I, Cohen-Pour M, Baumer M, Orda R: 99Tc(m)-tetrofosmin scintimammography for detecting breast cancer: a comparative study with 99Tc(m)-MIBI. Nucl Med Commun. 2001, 22: 807-11. 10.1097/00006231-200107000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanu A, Schillaci O, Meloni GB, Porcu A, Cottu P, Nuvoli S, Falchi A, Chessa F, Solinas ME, Madeddu G: The usefulness of 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT scintimammography in the detection of small size primary breast carcinomas. Int J Oncol. 2002, 21: 831-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madeddu G, Spanu A: Use of tomographic nuclear medicine procedures, SPECT and pinhole SPECT, with cationic lipophilic radiotracers for the evaluation of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004, 31 (Suppl 1): S23-34. 10.1007/s00259-004-1524-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanu A, Dettori G, Chiaramida P, Cottu P, Falchi A, Porcu A, Solinas ME, Nuvoli S, Madeddu G: The role of 99mTc-tetrofosmin Pinhole-SPECT in breast cancer axillary lymph node staging. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2000, 15: 81-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanu A, Tanda F, Dettori G, Manca A, Chessa F, Porcu A, Falchi A, Nuvoli S, Madeddu G: The role of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin pinhole-SPECT in breast cancer non palpable axillary lymph node metastases detection. Q J Nucl Med. 2003, 47: 116-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanu A, Dettori G, Nuvoli S, Porcu A, Falchi A, Cottu P, Solinas ME, Scanu AM, Chessa F, Madeddu G: (99)mTc-tetrofosmin SPET in the detection of both primary breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001, 28: 1781-94. 10.1007/s00259-001-0657-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanu A, Dettori G, Chessa F, Porcu A, Cottu P, Solinas P, Falchi A, Solinas ME, Scanu AM, Nuvoli S, Madeddu G: 99mTc-Tetrofosmin pinhole-SPECT (P-SPECT) and radioguided sentinel node (SN) biopsy and in breast cancer axillary lymph node staging. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2001, 16: 501-13. 10.1089/10849780152752100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mankoff D, Dunnwald L, Kinahan P: Are We Ready for Dedicated Breast Imaging Approaches?. J Nucl Med. 2003, 44: 594-595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avril N, Dose J, Janicke F, et al: Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. J Clin Oncol. 1996, 14: 1848-57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mankoff DA, Dunnwald LK, Gralow JR, et al: Blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer: relationship to response to therapy. J Nucl Med. 2002, 43: 500-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tseng J, Dunnwald LK, Schubert EK, Link JM, Minoshima S, Muzi M, Mankoff DA: 18F-FDG Kinetics in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Correlation with Tumor Blood Flow and Changes in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2004, 45 (11): 1829-37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chua B, Ung O, Taylor R, Boyages J: Is Information from Axillary Dissection Relevant to Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer?. Breast J. 2003, 9: 478-84. 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2003.09607.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tornai MP, Bowsher JE, Jaszczak RJ, Pieper BC, Greer KL, Hardenbergh PH, Coleman RE: Mammotomography with pinhole incomplete circular orbit SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2003, 44: 583-93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taillefer R: Clinical applications of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography. Semin Nucl Med. 2005, 35: 100-115. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2385/5/4/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.